SHOCKING ROYAL SECRET EXPOSED: Meghan Markle’s Hidden Fury at Being “Below” Kate Middleton in Palace Pecking Order – “She Believed She Had FAR More to Offer!”

# SHOCKING ROYAL SECRET EXPOSED: Meghan Markle’s Hidden Fury at Being “Below” Kate Middleton in Palace Pecking Order – “She Believed She Had FAR More to Offer!” ### The Deep-Rooted Rivalry That Tore the Royals Apart From the Inside In a bombshell revelation that has rocked the foundations of the British monarchy, insiders have disclosed the explosive truth behind Meghan Markle’s growing resentment toward her sister-in-law, Kate Middleton, and brother-in-law, Prince William.

At the heart of the rift? Meghan’s profound discomfort with being positioned “below” the future King and Queen in the rigid royal protocol – a hierarchy she viewed as outdated and incompatible with her self-image as a modern, empowered feminist icon. Sources close to the former Duchess of Sussex paint a picture of a woman who entered the Royal Family brimming with confidence and ambition, only to clash head-on with centuries-old traditions. “Meghan disliked being ‘below’ Kate and William in protocol,” one palace insider revealed. “She viewed herself as a modern feminist figure who should stand equal, even though royal hierarchy demanded it.” This sentiment wasn’t just a passing frustration – it fueled a simmering rivalry that many believe planted the seeds for the Sussexes’ dramatic exit from senior royal duties in 2020.

Meghan, a successful actress and activist before marrying Prince Harry, reportedly struggled to accept her secondary role. “She believed she had more to offer, more to say, and more experience than Kate,” the source continued, highlighting Meghan’s background as a “self-made woman” who had built her career independently, in stark contrast to Kate’s more traditional path. The seeds of rivalry had been planted long before Meghan’s fairy-tale wedding in 2018. Royal experts point to early signs of tension, including Meghan’s alleged unease during joint appearances where protocol dictated that William and Kate took precedence. Walking behind the Cambridges at events, curtsying to senior royals, and deferring on public platforms – these were non-negotiable elements of royal life that Meghan found stifling.

Renowned biographer Tom Bower, in his explosive book *Revenge: Meghan, Harry, and the War Between the Windsors*, delves deep into this dynamic. Bower claims Meghan was “shocked” by the palace’s unyielding structure, hating the idea of being a “second-rate princess” to Kate. One former staffer quoted in the book described Meghan as envying Kate’s effortless poise, while viewing her as “too eager to please” and a “goody-two-shoes girl.” Meghan, Bower alleges, saw herself as the heir to Princess Diana’s legacy – a bold, outspoken force for change – but felt constrained by having to “play second fiddle.”

Another insider echoed this in reports to *The Telegraph*, stating Meghan “felt she had more of a right to speak” at events because of her philanthropic experience and career achievements. “She seemed uncomfortable having to play second fiddle,” the source said, noting that Meghan regarded the Royal Foundation – already thriving under William and Kate – as a “well-oiled machine” she arrived too late to reshape. Royal commentator Tom Quinn, drawing from former Kensington Palace staff in his book *Yes, Ma’am:

The Secret Life of Royal Servants*, reveals Meghan “really disliked the hierarchy.” Staff described her as a “fighter” who pushed back against the institution’s rules, unlike Kate, who was praised for her willingness to “learn the ropes” patiently. One aide reportedly called Kate “Meghan without the messianic complex,” underscoring the contrasting approaches: Kate’s quiet adaptation versus Meghan’s drive to modernize and lead. The protocol clashes manifested in subtle but telling ways.

At official engagements, William and Kate always walked ahead, a visual reminder of the line of succession. Meghan, married to the “spare” rather than the heir, was perpetually reminded of her place. Insiders claim this grated on her feminist ideals – why should she defer to Kate, who “hadn’t really had her own career,” when Meghan had advocated for women’s rights on global stages long before joining the Firm? This perceived inequality extended beyond symbolism. After their successful 2018 Australia tour – hailed as a triumph – Meghan reportedly fantasized about stepping into a leadership role akin to Diana’s, only to realize the hierarchy wouldn’t allow it. Bower writes that Meghan saw herself as the “new Princess Diana,” but grew “unhappy with her position” when reality set in.

The infamous bridesmaid dress fitting ahead of the 2018 wedding became a flashpoint, with reports (later flipped in the Oprah interview) of tears and tensions. But deeper issues, like Meghan’s alleged comparisons involving children and her frustration over resources, highlighted the growing divide. Former staff recall Meghan’s “warm, hug-everyone” California style clashing with the more reserved Cambridges, who “tended to flinch” at her affection. Harry reportedly complained that his family wasn’t supportive enough, fueling Meghan’s sense of isolation. As the rivalry deepened, it strained the “Fab Four” facade.

Joint events became awkward, and by 2019, the households split. Insiders say Meghan’s belief in her superior experience and voice made compromise impossible. “She thought she knew better than an institution that’s been around for 1,000 years,” one staffer quipped. The culmination? Megxit. Sources claim Meghan’s refusal to accept subordination – viewing it as antithetical to her feminist principles – was a key driver. She wanted equality, not hierarchy; impact, not deference.

Years later, the echoes persist. Recent reports suggest ongoing “sharp” rivalry, with Meghan mirroring Kate’s initiatives from afar. But palace sources say Kate remains unfazed, secure in her role as future Queen. This insider account exposes the human cost of royal rigidity: a modern woman clashing with ancient protocol, believing she had “more to offer” than the system allowed.

The seeds of rivalry, planted early, grew into a fracture that changed the monarchy forever. Was Meghan’s ambition a threat to tradition, or a necessary evolution the Royals weren’t ready for? One thing is clear: the battle for equality within the palace walls ignited a war that still simmers today.