The lie that refuses to die just got a hell of a lot louder in 2025.Six years after the world first gasped at the impossible folding, collapsing, square-shaped “bump” on Meghan Markle, the conspiracy that won’t stay buried has roared back to life – and this time there’s a mountain of new visual evidence even the most devoted Sussex stan can’t explain away.Because let’s be honest: normal pregnant bellies do not behave like this.They don’t drop to the knees one day and pop back up to the ribcage the next.
They don’t fold in half like cheap silicone when you squat to pet a dog.
They don’t look perfectly round and hard in one photo and then suddenly lumpy, baggy, and sliding sideways ten minutes later.
And they definitely do not stay perfectly motionless while the “mother” twerks vigorously in a hospital gown the day before “giving birth.”Yet that is exactly what we have seen – over and over and over again – from the woman the internet now simply calls “Square Moonbump Markle.
Exhibit A: The Original Sin – Birkenhead, January 2019This is where it all began.Meghan, supposedly seven months pregnant with Archie, steps out in a tight purple Babaton by Aritzia dress and a red coat.
She bends down to talk to a little girl.
And the “bump” literally collapses into a perfect square crease right in front of the cameras.Not a gentle rounding.
Not a natural shift.
A hard, sharp, 90-degree square fold – exactly like the silicone prosthetic “moonbumps” actresses use on TV sets.The footage is still online. Slow it down to 0.25 speed and watch it yourself. The damn thing folds like a laptop screen.
Question #1: Why has this video never been properly explained by Kensington Palace, Meghan, or any doctor on earth?
Exhibit B: The Fiji “Popcorn Bump” – October 2018Five months pregnant.
Meghan walks across a market in a tight blue dress.
The bump is enormous – practically under her chin.
Two hours later? It’s half the size and sitting suspiciously low.
By evening it’s migrated back upward again.Real babies do not inflate and deflate like pool toys.
Exhibit C: The Christmas Day Disappearing Act – 2018Morning: massive, protruding bump under a navy coat.
Afternoon: completely flat stomach in photos taken just hours later.
Evening: bump is back, but now it’s shifted three inches to the left.Either Meghan has a uterus made of elastic, or she was adjusting her prosthesis between engagements like a costume change.
Exhibit D: The Doll Reveal – May 8, 2019The world finally gets to see “baby Archie.”
Except… it doesn’t move. It doesn’t breathe. Its head flops like silicone when Harry awkwardly grips it.
Watch Harry’s thumb jam into the baby’s back – exactly where you’d press to activate a breathing mechanism on a Reborn doll.And Meghan? She keeps one hand protectively on her completely deflated stomach as if she forgot she was supposed to still be “be pregnant” for another few weeks.
Question #2: Why were no doctors or midwives ever photographed with the newborn, like every other royal birth in history?Exhibit E: The Twerking Video That Broke The Internet – June 2025Fast-forward to 2025. Meghan releases footage of herself in a hospital room, supposedly in labor with Lilibet, twerking wildly while Harry films and laughs.
Her bump is massive, lumpy, and appears to be sliding around under the gown.
At one point it visibly detaches from her body and flops sideways.Internet sleuths enhanced the footage. The outline of what looks exactly like the edge of a silicone moonbump is clearly visible.Even mainstream outlets like The Sun and Daily Mail ran articles asking: “Is Meghan’s bump real?”Her own friend Christopher Bouzy had to go on TV to beg people to stop talking about it because it was making her life “a nightmare.”If it’s so ridiculous, why not just release the long-form birth footage like normal celebrities do?
Question #3: Why does the bump in that twerking video have a perfect straight line across the top – exactly like the £140 Moonbump Classic silicone prosthetic sold online?Exhibit F: The Impossible Post-Partum BodyBoth times Meghan was photographed within days of “giving birth” looking like she’d never carried a child in her life.
No swelling. No loose skin. No stretched belly button. Nothing.She was papped hiking in skinny jeans two weeks after Archie, looking like a Victoria’s Secret model.Real mothers who have pushed 8-pound babies out of their bodies do not look like that. Ever.The Biggest Question of AllWhy has no hospital ever confirmed the births?
Why were the birth certificates signed by a doctor who works out of a private clinic the Sussexes are known to use – and who conveniently listed the birth location as “home” when everyone knows it was Portland Hospital?
Why did the palace announce Archie’s birth hours before Meghan had even supposedly gone into labor?And most damningly – why did Queen Elizabeth reportedly tell aides she was “deeply troubled” by the pregnancy photos and refused to sign the Letters Patent for Archie’s title until she saw more proof?This isn’t hate.
This is pattern recognition.When someone’s “pregnancy” defies every law of human biology for two full years, when the evidence is this consistent, this bizarre, this in-your-face……maybe, just maybe, “Square Moonbump” Markle isn’t a conspiracy theory.Maybe it’s the biggest royal deception of the century.And maybe – just maybe – the chickens (or the silicone prosthetics) are finally coming home to roost.
